Tech Worker Rights: Minor Edits
parent
b7c27dd6e7
commit
51d1767e44
|
|
@ -47,11 +47,11 @@ Andrew's sharp tongue is *partially* responsible for the civil war within the Ha
|
|||
|
||||
Personally, Abner believes Andrew’s diagnosis of the industry’s problems was largely accurate. However, unlike Andrew, Handmade Cities disagrees open-source software or non-profits will rescue us; read our other Key Objective: [Protect Small Software Shops](/operation2030/directives/small-software-shops). In addition, we're betting on a culture where social status is conferred to long-term business owners. Companies like [Sublime HQ](https://www.sublimehq.com) and the mighty [Valve](https://store.steampowered.com/) (no longer small!) are excellent examples of this approach. We require the presence of nimble competitors keeping Big Tech [on their toes](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrmqC2A3QK8).
|
||||
|
||||
That said, Abner and Andrew are aligned on a crucial point: tech workers need collective bargaining power. Not everyone can start a business or join a benevolent employer. So whether it's through guilds, unions, or another form, workers (not management) need a seat at the table pronto: being well-paid no longer cuts it. Without negotiating power we bear witness to the continued rise of mediocre software. Workers are forced to endure hostile AI/LLM takeovers without a proper say. Mass layoffs march on.
|
||||
That said, Abner and Andrew are aligned on a crucial point: tech workers need collective bargaining power. Not everyone can start a business or join a benevolent employer. So whether it's through guilds, unions, or another form, workers (not management) need a seat at the table pronto: being well-paid no longer cuts it. Without negotiating power we bear witness to the continued rise of mediocre software. Workers are forced to swallow hostile AI/LLM takeovers without a proper say. Mass layoffs march on.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Handling Future Controversy
|
||||
|
||||
This subject matter is part of the 20% of our [80-20](/operation2030/structure/80-20) content split, so it’s straightforward for community members to skip if there’s no interest. Advisory board members, meetup hosts and paid staff are also not strictly required to promote this subject themselves if it conflicts with their views.
|
||||
This subject matter is part of the 20% of our [80-20](/operation2030/structure/80-20) content split, so it’s straightforward for community members to skip if there’s no interest. Advisory board members, meetup hosts, and paid staff are also not strictly required to promote this subject themselves if it conflicts with their views.
|
||||
|
||||
Lastly, we're open to creating debate panels after a hotly contested talk. This all is in accordance with our philosophy [Zero Favoritism](/operation2030/philosophy/zero-favorites).
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue