Tech Worker Rights: Minor Edits

main
abnercoimbre 2025-04-09 11:33:17 -07:00
parent b7c27dd6e7
commit 51d1767e44
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -47,11 +47,11 @@ Andrew's sharp tongue is *partially* responsible for the civil war within the Ha
Personally, Abner believes Andrews diagnosis of the industrys problems was largely accurate. However, unlike Andrew, Handmade Cities disagrees open-source software or non-profits will rescue us; read our other Key Objective: [Protect Small Software Shops](/operation2030/directives/small-software-shops). In addition, we're betting on a culture where social status is conferred to long-term business owners. Companies like [Sublime HQ](https://www.sublimehq.com) and the mighty [Valve](https://store.steampowered.com/) (no longer small!) are excellent examples of this approach. We require the presence of nimble competitors keeping Big Tech [on their toes](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrmqC2A3QK8).
That said, Abner and Andrew are aligned on a crucial point: tech workers need collective bargaining power. Not everyone can start a business or join a benevolent employer. So whether it's through guilds, unions, or another form, workers (not management) need a seat at the table pronto: being well-paid no longer cuts it. Without negotiating power we bear witness to the continued rise of mediocre software. Workers are forced to endure hostile AI/LLM takeovers without a proper say. Mass layoffs march on.
That said, Abner and Andrew are aligned on a crucial point: tech workers need collective bargaining power. Not everyone can start a business or join a benevolent employer. So whether it's through guilds, unions, or another form, workers (not management) need a seat at the table pronto: being well-paid no longer cuts it. Without negotiating power we bear witness to the continued rise of mediocre software. Workers are forced to swallow hostile AI/LLM takeovers without a proper say. Mass layoffs march on.
#### Handling Future Controversy
This subject matter is part of the 20% of our [80-20](/operation2030/structure/80-20) content split, so its straightforward for community members to skip if theres no interest. Advisory board members, meetup hosts and paid staff are also not strictly required to promote this subject themselves if it conflicts with their views.
This subject matter is part of the 20% of our [80-20](/operation2030/structure/80-20) content split, so its straightforward for community members to skip if theres no interest. Advisory board members, meetup hosts, and paid staff are also not strictly required to promote this subject themselves if it conflicts with their views.
Lastly, we're open to creating debate panels after a hotly contested talk. This all is in accordance with our philosophy [Zero Favoritism](/operation2030/philosophy/zero-favorites).